In part 2 I revealed the greatest American and in part three I will justify the choice by taking you into the near future—in which one can see America sitting back on that shining hill—or will it be a fading mirage?
Fossil Cars for Fossil Fools will soon belong to the Dinosaur era. First imagine the year is 2022 and we are taking a trip down memory lane.
The above is hardly a comprehensive list of relics from a bygone era:
Oh and what is left? What will be next to go?
A second car,
Massive parking areas,
Why have a Car?
90% of cars in the world at any given point are doing nothing. Yet you are carrying the cost of depreciation, of Insurance, of space, of time and money in cleaning, maintenance and repair–with the constant need to go to gas stations, stuck in traffic with numerous others doing equally redundant exercises.
In many Countries now, transportation choices are changing rapidly, especially in urban areas. As early as 2016-17 Singapore is slated to having driver-less “pods.” Once one City can show success, other City’s will just look silly if they do nothing. In the UK the number of men under 20 seeking a driving license has fallen by 72%. In just one year in Britain, the percentage of 17 to 20 year-olds with driving licenses fell from 48% in the early 1990’s to 35% last year.
As The Guardian reports; “Young people today would rather have the latest smartphone than a flashy car. And the number of them who can drive is plummeting. Is Britain’s love affair with the car really over?”
Parents reliving their own adolescent dreams hurry to pass on the same dream to their kids, oblivious to the fact that kids, while not wanting to bite the hands that feed them, are hardly thirsting for this economic anchor. For today’s kids, ever smarter phones are indispensable, they are well-trained not to drink and drive, always have a designated driver, gotten used to shared rides, to “UBERring it”—and just use their parents cars when they do actually need a car.
OK—so let us look at what the naysayers will say:
More expensive than a Fossil Car ?
In 2016—yes EV’s on paper remain expensive to buy (if you forget a, long term cost of ownership, costs of pollution, global warming, costs of oil inspired wars, etc.
But within five years this rather feeble argument will be turned on its head. Let me explain the math (since I am no engineer this will be kept real simple, I really hope that I am not being too simplistic).
As I understand it, the following statements are all true.
- The cost of a battery until recently has been about $1,000 per Kilo Watt hour.(Kw/h)
- People have being saying that if this cost were to fall to about $100 per Kw/h –that would signal the end of the fossil engine.
- Government projections had assumed that a target of $200 per Kw/h would not be achieved until 2040.
- The Tesla Model S–Kw/h cost is now only $190. GM claims a number of $145–but I believe their battery is a different and less dynamic Lithium ion effort.
- The new Gigawatt battery facility will likely bring down the cost dramatically in time for the Model 3—end of 2017 $124?
- $100 and then less by 2019?
Notes about above chart
- data for 2010-2015 from Bloomberg
- data for 2016 based upon Tesla comments about the Model S
- projection for 2017 – based upon latest hints dropped by Elon Musk re the Model 3 Nevada Gigafactory Savings projected for 2nd half of 2017
Now very few people had been expecting this type of progress–thus all articles about EV viability, and the projected end times for fossil cars are suddenly obsolete.
But it only gets worse for old fossils. Your average fossil car gets slightly more expensive every year. But this will not sit well considering EV’s will get significantly cheaper every year.
Let’s do the Math.
We will take the Tesla Model S 90 Kw/h. At present the battery costs $250 x 90 = $22,500. Well in 2021, this cost is likely to come down by half, plus economies of scale will allow other parts and fixed costs to come down dramatically.
Will the Model S 90 cost less? No, because it will be discontinued and its replacement will soon (i.e. around 2022-24) have a range of 600 miles and do 0-60 in 2.5 seconds (this could happen far quicker -basically any time)
Range anxiety–Long stops at recharging stations:
Another concern is range anxiety and wasted time spent at supercharging stations:
In the near future EV’s will likely have a range of 300-400 miles.
Presently on average an American stops in at a garage once a week for an average of 10 minutes a pop. 500 minutes a year.
But EV owners will be recharging at home virtually all the time. Yes on the few occasions when they travel more than 300-400 miles on a single trip they might need to stop for 30 minutes. On such trips they would likely need a bathroom /coffee break regardless. But assuming no such desire and that such trips happen 10 ten times a year–such drivers will still save 200 minutes year by bypassing gas filling pit stops.
Cost of ownership:
It has been variously estimated that the 5-10 year $70,000 Tesla Model S has a similar cost of ownership to cars costing less than $35,000–it would be fair to state that the cost of ownership for the $35,000 Model 3 will be half of the cost of an average fossilized car.
Old Batteries will be hard to dispose of and cause pollution:
This is rapidly becoming a myth. I say this by making the following assumptions.
- We are discussing Lithium Ion batteries.
- Such batteries have a 10 year(?) useful life (in a car –so long as they retain 80% of their original integrity)
- It is presently presumed that this integrity can be maintained for at least 250,000 miles. Musk evidently plans to stretch this to 1,000,000 miles
- Once such a battery has reached an end to its useful life in a car, it can then be re-purposed for more utilitarian tasks – such as a storing solar energy for use at night.
- Once that “million miler” battery has become inefficient at the above task it can be recycled, the key materials separated and then used again.
Detroit has the infrastructure and money to swamp the new order:
Putting aside that the taxpayers until recently owned much of Detroit; this argument is past its sell-by date. Tesla is now valued at say 50% of General Motors, although Tesla’s production is but a tiny fraction.
A typical naysayer was to say of this dynamic:
“However, this is not a Prius, and the masses will not be owning a Tesla anytime soon. The average price for a Tesla Model S is listed at MSRP levels of $71,070 to $94,900. That hardly fits the budget of most working Americans”.
This was said over a year ago–but surely you can now see just how unimaginative orthodox punditry is.
Chevy will soon be releasing its masterpiece—the Bolt. If they had done this 15 years ago, and done it in such a fashion as to threaten their core products—then they would not be a laughing stock.
As The Business Insider explains:
- Digitally centered consumer is sick and tired of General Motors, BMW, Mercedes, Audi, Toyota etc. and almost every existing Auto manufacture who have shown zero innovation and have been producing “Ugly Tiffin Boxes” for decades
- Tesla Model 3 has been designed for the iPhone generation consumer, whose lives are digitally super-centered—and competition is completely clueless—somehow it seems that existing auto manufacturers believe that iPhones can be powered by Gasoline and not Batteries
Tesla has the momentum, the Car factory, the battery factory (almost) and most importantly the brains. Talking about brains, Apple and Google both have more money than god, and more brains than all the fossils combined. They are now on the case. Detroit has always been a laggard compared to the Germans and Japanese–but now America is strategically set to be the driving force, but that will require new drivers.
The last of the fossil arguments—why should I pay for the $7,500 tax credit for other people?
Well this is the argument I will get most joy in eviscerating, and doing it in a way that few other people will have the balls to do. I can make this argument because I have believed, with every fiber of my being–all through my adult life, what we all should have been doing for the last decades. The facts have long since proven that I am right. So this is my response to such old fossils:
Why have you been allowed to drive a fossil vehicle free of the consequences of your demand for such a vehicle? Why should you not pay for the costs you create in creating an unnecessary demand for oil–that achieved the following:
- Drives up the cost of oil
- Pollutes the planet, spewing sickness, and inducing smog
- Exacerbates global warming
- Enriches humanities enemies whether it be in the Middle East, or the Russian, or those in the Stupidparty congress.
- Creates oil wars, creates religious fundamentalism, creates terrorism
Jimmy Carter spelled this all out back in 1977. If you chose not listen to the obvious, then how dare you complain if some of your tax dollars get used to clean up the mess you created. Only bad people, or very uninformed people could possibly be walking around without a feeling of huge guilt.
But of course this (whining about the tax credits) is an old fossil argument–because by 2021–not only will such subsidies be ancient history, but they will no longer be necessary. There will be no point in flogging a deadbeat fossil mode of transport into the ground as it will have driven itself to the knacker’s yard on its own humiliated horsepower.
Good bye and good riddance!
And now for the “worstest” American